Loading...
#10 Action on dissolution of Ice Skating Center Advisory Committee and Cable Advisory CommitteeCITY MANAGER’S OFFICE MEMORANDUM January 13, 2012 TO: City Council FROM:Rebecca Smith, Management Assistant SUBJECT: Action on dissolution of the Ice Skating Center Advisory Committee and the Cable Advisory Committee Request The Acting Recreation Director requests the Council approve the dissolution of the Ice Skating Center Advisory Committee. The Library Director requests the Council approve the dissolution of the Cable Advisory Committee. Staff Recommendation Considering the difficulty in obtaining quorums for these committees and the other options available for garnering feedback, staff recommends the Council dissolve the Ice Skating Center Advisory Committee and the Cable Advisory Committee. City Manager Recommendation If the Council determines it best not to dissolve one or both committees, I recommend that we may want to look at the structure and mission of the committees and determine any necessary changes. Recreation Recommendation The Acting Recreation Director recommends the Council approve the dissolution of the Ice Skating Center Advisory Committee. Library Recommendation The Library Director recommends the Council approve the dissolution of the Cable Advisory Committee. Suggestion Motion I move to dissolve the Ice Skating Center Advisory Committee and the Cable Advisory Committee. Ice Skating Center Advisory Committee Background The Ice Skating Center Advisory Committee was established in 1979 and was modified in 1997. This committee was very helpful when the operations of the ice skating center were managed by an outside company; however, with city staff managing the center, the operations are stable. In April 2008 the committee was dissolved due to lack of attendance, thus leading to an inability to meet because there was not a quorum for meetings. When the committee was dissolved, the Council approved staff’s recommendation to add an additional member to the Leisure Services Advisory Committee (LSAC) to represent the ice skating community. 1 In August of 2009 the Council chose to reinstate the advisory committee; however, the ice skating community representative remained on the Leisure Services Advisory Committee. Since reinstating the committee, staff has experienced significant difficulties in obtaining a quorum for meetings of the Ice Skating Center Advisory Committee. In 2011, staff scheduled 6 meetings; 2 of those were held with a quorum of members present, while the remaining 4 were cancelled due to lack of attendees. Leisure Services sent a letter to committee members in December 2011 indicating staff’s intent to bring the dissolution forward and to date has received no comments. Should the council approve staff’s recommendation to dissolve the Ice Skating Center Committee, staff would take items requiring feedback to the Leisure Services Advisory Committee and in fact, has already done so in at least one occasion already. Cable Advisory Committee Background The Cable Advisory Committee was established in August 1993 and four years later public access television began broadcasting. While the Committee was very helpful during the infancy stages of the public access channel, the operations are now very stable. In addition, local franchises lost much of their control to the state when the Video Competition Act (known as Act #42) took effect in 2008. This diminished the role and responsibility of the Cable Advisory Committee. Since then it has been difficult to find dedicated members to serve on the committee, and the situation is not unique to Janesville as many cities throughout the state have disbanded their Cable Advisory Committees. In addition, those that are most interested in the station prefer to volunteer as a camera operator or as a Friends member, rather than serve on a committee. The Committee has met twice in the last year, in comparison to the typical six meetings per year, due to an inability to obtain interest and a quorum for meetings. The Library Director discussed this subject with the Hedberg Public Library Board of Trustees and they welcome the opportunity to serve as a policy making and oversight board for JATV. JATV and library staff can be assured that if a topic requires feedback, the Library Board would be meeting in a timely fashion to provide the necessary review. Pros & Cons to Dissolving these Committees Pros 1. Saves staff time in trying to administer committees where quorums are routinely difficult to obtain 2. There are other mechanisms in place that can be counted on for garnering feedback – Leisure Services Advisory Committee for the Ice Center and the Library Board for JATV 3. Being part of a committee that can’t be depended on to meet regularly may over time disenfranchise interested members from wishing to attend future meetings or to volunteer with the City in general 2 Cons 1. Any members that are willing to attend meetings would no longer be able to continue their service on the committee being dissolved Analysis These committees are not functioning properly due to a lack of interest/attendance and, thus, an inability to obtain a quorum. There are other mechanisms in place to obtain citizen feedback - Leisure Services Advisory Committee for the Ice Center and the Library Board for JATV thus, continuing to provide an outlet garner feedback when necessary. There are also ways for any existing committee members to be involved in the future if they so desire, such as volunteering with the Leisure Services Department, becoming a ‘Friend’ of JATV or completing a Volunteer Interest Form. Existing committee members would also be able to volunteer to serve on any other city boards, commissions or committees of interest to them. CC: Eric Levitt, City Manager Jacob J. Winzenz, Assistant City Manager Bryan McCormick, Library Director Shelley Slapak, Acting Recreation Director 3