Loading...
Full Agenda Packet CITY OF JANESVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, March 28, 2011 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Roll Call. 3. Minutes of City Council meetings: “C” A.Regular meeting of March 14, 2011. B.Closed session minutes of December 14, 2009; March 22, 2010; April 12, 2010; September 27, 2010; and October 11, 2010. 4. Licenses; and Recommendations of the Alcohol License Advisory Committee. (Refer to separate agenda.) “C” 5. Financial statements for the months of January & February, 2011. “C” OLD BUSINESS 1. Requests and comments from the public regarding items on the Agenda not requiring a public hearing. 2. Second reading, public hearing and action on a proposed ordinance amending JGO Chapter 10.71 regulating the use of Neighborhood Electric Vehicles so as to regulate the use of Low Speed Vehicles in the City of Janesville. (File Ord. No. 2011-477) 3. Second reading, public hearing and action on a proposed ordinance creating JGO Section 9.39.025 and amending JGO Section 9.39.030 prohibiting the unlawful use of computerized communication systems in the City of Janesville. (File Ord. No. 2011-479) ----------------------- “C” – This designation indicates an item that the City Council will take up under a Consent Agenda. City Council Agenda – March 28, 2011 Page 2 NEW BUSINESS 1. Action on a request to waive the special event fee for the Janesville Farmers Market. 2. Action on a proposed resolution to add supplemental life insurance to employee benefit package. (File Res. No. 2011-781) 3. Action to authorize the City Manager to file a simplified water rate increase with the Public Service Commission. 4. Waive notice of special meeting (study session) scheduled for April 27 at 5:30 p.m. regarding financial policies. 5. Requests and comments from the public on matters which can be affected by Council action. 6. Matters not on the Agenda. 7. Consideration of a motion to convene into closed session, pursuant to Wisconsin Statute Section 19.85(1)(e), for the purpose of deliberating and setting the negotiation and bargaining strategies, terms, and conditions for a potential industrial site TIF development agreement since competitive and/or bargaining reasons require a closed session. The use of audible cell phone ringers and active use and response to cellular phone technology by the governing body, staff and members of the public is discouraged in the Council Chambers while the Council is in session. PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF JANESVILLE, WISCONSIN REGULAR MEETING MARCH 14, 2011 VOL. 62 NO. 33 Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Janesville held in the Municipal Building on March 14, 2011. The meeting was called to order by Council President Voskuil at 7:00 PM. Present: Council President Voskuil, Councilmembers Brunner, McDonald, Perrotto, Rashkin, Truman and Steeber. CONSENT AGENDA Regular City Council meeting minutes of February 28, 2011. Closed session minutes of: August 10, 2009, August 24, 2009, September 14, 2009, September 28, 2009, October 26, 2009, November 9, 2009, February 8, 2010, May 24, 2010, June 14, 2010, June 28, 2010, August 9, 2010 and October 25, 2010. Licenses; and Recommendations of the Alcohol License Advisory Committee. Council President Voskuil stated that all items on the consent agenda would be approved if there were no objections. There were none. OLD BUSINESS 1. Requests and comments from the public regarding items on the Agenda not requiring a public hearing. Ty Bollerud, 419 S. Walnut St., spoke against the ordinance prohibiting the unlawful use of computerized communication equipment (NB #5). Andreah Briarmoon, 339 S. Locust St., spoke against the proposed snow policies and suggested the City should use the citation method and allow citizens to go through the courts for relief. 2. Public hearing and possible action on a final resolution for public works contract 2011-1 (street resurfacing including curb and gutter, water, sewer, and paving). James Erickson, owner of the commercial building located at 3618 Ridge Dr., asked questions regarding the rate calculations and interest rates. Andreah Briarmoon, 339 S. Locust St., stated that developers should pay 100% of the costs and not rely on the City for financing of improvements. Ty Bollerud, 419 S. Walnut St., stated the City should look out for citizens rights when constructing public improvements. Paul Jacobson, member of Green Tek LLC, requested that his assessment be waived or granted a non-use deferment. The public hearing was closed. Councilmember Steeber moved to adopt said resolution and approve a 5 year non-use deferment for water main affecting parcel 02333400092 owned by Enterprise Drive, LLC and parcel 0304100002 owned by Arthur Donaldson, seconded by Councilmember Brunner. Councilmember Steeber offered a friendly amendment to allow a 10 year payment plan for Green Tek, LLC and it was accepted by the seconder of the motion. The Council voted on the motion, as amended, and it passed unanimously. (File Res. No. 2011-780) NEW BUSINESS 1. Award of Bid Schedule “A” – 2011: contract 2011-1 (street resurfacing); contract 2011-2 (curb & gutter and sidewalk replacement); contract 2011-3 (manhole rehabilitation/reconstruction); contract 2011- 4 (new sidewalk); contract 2011-5 (South Pearl Street reconstruction); contract 2011-6 (Black Bridge water main); contract 2011-7 (Palmer Drive & CAMDEN parking lot reconstruction). Councilmember Steeber moved to include the necessary funding in the 2011 note issue for the above contracts and award the following contracts to: Contract Company Amount 2011-1 Rock Road Companies, Inc. $1,175,714.15 2011-2 Yeske Construction Co., Inc. $658,725.00 2011-3 Infrastructure Technologies, Inc. $211,859.00 2011-4 J.B. Johnson Bros., LLC $408,113.75 2011-5 Frank Silha & Sons Excavating, Inc. $467,635.50 2011-6 Rawson Contractors, Inc. $1,121,783.00 2011-7 Rock Road Companies, Inc. $233,375.49 Councilmember Truman seconded the motion and it passed by the following vote: Aye: Brunner, Perrotto, Rashkin, Steeber, Truman and Voskuil. Nay: McDonald. By consensus, the Council requested that a study session be held after the election to discuss financial and debt policies of the City and to review future borrowings. 2. Action on a proposed resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a lease with the American Legion Baseball of Janesville, WI for the operation of a portion of Riverside Park. Councilmember Steeber moved to adopt said resolution, seconded by Councilmember Truman and passed unanimously. (File Res. No. 2011-779) 3. Discuss and provide direction to staff on sidewalk snow removal policies on private property. John Whitcomb, Operations Director, presented information on our current policy and options to add proactive inspections and citations. City Manager Levitt stated that there was more citizen compliance with snow removal by citizens. If the Council were to enhance enforcement efforts than the reinspection fees would be the best option. The Council requested that the following options be placed on a future agenda: a) Increase fines for parking violations during a snow emergency. b) Implement a towing option. c) Issue citations. d) Develop information on volunteer groups that assist elderly and handicapped with snow removal. 4. A proposed ordinance amending JGO Chapter 10.71 regulating the use of Neighborhood Electric Vehicles so as to regulate the use of Low Speed Vehicles in the City of Janesville was introduced and scheduled for a public hearing on March 28, 2011. (File Ord. No. 2011-477) 5. A proposed ordinance creating JGO Section 9.39.025 and amending JGO Section 9.39.030 prohibiting the unlawful use of computerized communication systems in the City of Janesville was introduced and scheduled for a public hearing on March 28, 2011. (File Ord. No. 2011-479) 6. Requests and comments from the public on matters which can be affected by Council action. Richard Erdman, 411 W. Milwaukee St., and Lee Ann Heise, representing the Exclusive Company, requested that Council revisit the pawnbroker ordinance because of lack of notice and information provided to effected businesses. Ty Bollerud, 419 S. Walnut St., requested the City explore hydro-electric power generation. Andreah Briarmoon, 339 S. Locust St., stated that less than 1 percent of residents were in non-compliance for snow removal this year and the Council should stop the regulation. 7. Matters not on the Agenda. Councilmember Rashkin requested information on the communication process used to inform second hand and pawn shop dealers about the ordinance regulating their businesses. Councilmember Perrotto stated that the Sustainability Committee requested that they review the plans for the proposed Ice Arena construction project. Councilmember Brunner stated that spring is here because Frostee Freeze is now open. Council President Voskuil stated that the next Big Give is scheduled for Saturday, April 9, 2011. 8. Councilmember Steeber moved to convene into closed session, pursuant to Wisconsin Statute Section 19.85(1)(e) for the purpose of deliberating and setting the potential negotiating terms, conditions, and provisions of collective bargaining agreements and related bargaining strategies and matters; and setting the negotiation and bargaining strategies, terms, and conditions for a potential TIF #32 development agreement since competitive and/or bargaining reasons required a closed session. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Truman and passed unanimously. There being no further business, Council convened into closed session at 9:45 p.m. These minutes are not official until approved by the City Council. Jean Ann Wulf Clerk-Treasurer JANESVILLE CITY COUNCIL LICENSE AGENDA 3/28/2011 RECOMMENDED A. AMUSEMENT DEVICE AND CENTER-ORIGINAL Tom’s Rider’s In, LLC d/b/a Riders In Thomas W. Walters 721 Center Ave. B. ELECTRICIAN–ORIGINAL Chad A. Korish 6248 Carr Factory Rd., Cuba City, WI ACCOUNTING DIVISION MEMORANDUM March 18, 2011 TO: City Council FROM: Patty Lynch, Comptroller SUBJECT: Financial Statement for the Months of January and February 2011 The City prepares its Financial Statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals using the modified accrual method of accounting and is audited annually by Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP. We prepare interim financial statements for the Council’s review on a monthly basis. Division and Department Heads are responsible for monetary expenditures to ensure budget compliance. Revenues and expenditures are projected to year-end in June and September. Key operating funds include the General Fund, Water and Wastewater Utilities, and Sanitation Fund. A summary of their performance to budget, as compared to a three-year average, is presented in the following graphs. EXPENDITURE SUMMARY The graph below indicates that the General Fund, Water Utility, and Wastewater Utility expenditures are being made according to budget. Year-To-Date February ExpendituresCompared to Three-Year Average Current YTD 3 Yr. Avg. 30% Percent of Total Budget 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% General FundWater -Wastewater - OperatingOperatingSanitation REVENUE SUMMARY The graph below indicates revenue has been earned as anticipated. January and February 2011 Financial Statements March 17, 2011 Page 2 Year-To-Date February RevenuesCompared to Three-Year Average Current YTD 3 Yr. Avg. 45% 40% Percent of Total Budget 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% General FundWaterWastewaterSanitation Other items of interest in the Financial Statement are as follows: Proprietary Funds (page 4)  The Water Utility has a deficit operating cash balance of $1,697,672 at February 28, 2011. This is partly due to the timing of debt service payments. Principal and interest totaling $2,310,795 was paid in February. Water sales being 14% below projections is also a major factor. A simplified water rate increase is proposed to help fund the cash deficit.  The Stormwater Utility has a deficit operating cash balance of $248,682 at February 28, 2011. This is because revenue is billed on a quarterly basis after expenditures have been made.  Transit reports a negative cash balance of $429,205 due to the timing of grant reimbursements after expenditure are made. Special Revenue Fund Balance (page 5)  The Hedberg Public Library recognized property tax revenue of $3,207,919 in January.  TIF 3 has a positive balance of $162,529. The positive balance will be used to repay the general fund advance plus accrued interest.  Landfill long-term care of site #3023 ($211,869) will be reimbursed by an insurance policy we have in place for post closure care. Capital Projects Fund (page 6)  The City incurred expenditures in conjunction with road projects on Highway 11 from Wright Road to Highway 14 ($186,800). These costs will be funded with future special assessments or General Obligation note issue. January and February 2011 Financial Statements March 17, 2011 Page 3 General Fund (page 7)  Property tax revenue of $15,045,757 has been recognized for tax collections received through January 31, 2011.  State Highway Aids of $657,142 were received in January. A representative of the Administrative Services Department will be available at the Council Meeting on March 28, 2011 to respond to any questions Council may have relative to these reports. Once Council is satisfied, acceptance of the Financial Statement by consent and placing them on file would be in order. /Attachments cc: Jacob J, Winzenz, Director of Administrative Services/Assistant City Manager Eric J. Levitt, City Manager CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE MEMORANDUM March 15, 2011 TO: City Council FROM: Tim Wellnitz, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Second reading, public hearing, and action on a proposed ordinance amending JGO Chapter 10.71 regulating the use of Neighborhood Electric Vehicles so as to regulate the use of Low Speed Vehicles in the City of Janesville. (File Ord. No. 2011-477) Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council adopt Proposed Ordinance 2011-477 amending JGO Chapter 10.71 regulating the use of Neighborhood Electric Vehicles so as to regulate the use of Low Speed Vehicles in the City of Janesville. Assistant City Manager’s Recommendation I concur with the recommendation of staff. Suggested Motion I move to adopt Proposed Ordinance No. 2011-477. Background State law, Wis. Stats. § 346.94(22), regarding the use of neighborhood electric vehicles has changed so as to allow the operation of low-speed vehicles under certain circumstances. Low-speed vehicles include neighborhood electric vehicles as well as gas-powered vehicles. Low-speed vehicles are allowed within municipalities under state law. These vehicles are restricted to roads with a speed limit of 35 miles per hour or less and crossing intersections of state trunk highways or connecting highways that are controlled by traffic control signals where the speed limit at the intersection is 35 miles per hour or less. In addition, low-speed vehicles are allowed to operate on a connecting highway if the connecting highway has a speed limit of 25 miles per hour or less. Municipalities also have the option to prohibit the use of low-speed vehicles within the municipality or to allow the use of low-speed vehicles on all roadways within the territorial boundaries of the municipality where the speed limit is 35 miles per hour or less. Analysis Proposed Ordinance No. 2011-477 amends JGO Chapter 10.71, so as to permit the use of low-speed vehicles consistent with and as allowed under state law on all roadways within the City of Janesville where the speed limit is 35 miles per hour or less. cc: Eric Levitt, City Manager Jacob J. Winzenz, Assistant City Manager/Director of Administrative Services 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2011 - 477 An ordinance amending JGO Chapter 10.71 regulating the use of Neighborhood Electric Vehicles so as to regulate the use of Low Speed Vehicles in the City of Janesville with penalties as set forth in JGO 10.70.040. THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JANESVILLE DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Chapter 10.71 of the Code of General Ordinances of the City of Janesville is hereby amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 10.71 LOW-SPEED NEIGHBORHOOD ELECTRIC VEHICLES Sections: 10.71.010 Definition 10.71.020 Use permitted on certain city streets 10.71.030 Operation 10.71.040 Violations – Penalty 10.71.010 DEFINITION . “Neighborhood Electric Low-Speed Vehicle” (“LSV NEV”) means a motor vehicle: A. That is defined as a LSV NEV under state law, as from time to time amended or renumbered, i.e. Wis. Stats. § 349.26(1) 340.01(27h); or B. That is propelled by electric power and that conforms to the definition and requirements for low- speed vehicles as adopted in the federal motor vehicle safety standards for low-speed vehicles under 49 CFR 571.3 (b) and 571.500. “Neighborhood electric Low-speed vehicle” does not include a golf cart or moped. 10.71.020 USE PERMITTED ON CITY STREETS. A. The use of a NEV LSV is prohibited except as expressly authorized by this Chapter. B. The use of a NEV LSV is hereby authorized on roadways under the jurisdiction within of the City of Janesville upon which the speed limit is 35 miles per hour or less with the following exceptions. 1.may be used uponconnecting highways A NEV within the City of Janesville but only upon those sections where the speed limit is 35 miles per hour or less. The exact locations shall be as promulgated from time to time and at any time by the City Manager, who is hereby authorized to do so by the Common Council, as approved by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. All such locations shall be compiled, kept and updated in written form, and kept on file for public inspection at all times in the lobby of the Janesville Police Department, in the City Clerk-Treasurer’s Office and on the City's website. Such list of authorized locations is hereby adopted by reference and incorporated herein as if fully set forth verbatim. All additions and changes shall be updated on said list by the City Manager and/or his designees. 2.may crossstate trunk highways A NEV within the City of Janesville but only at public intersections where the speed limit upon the state trunk highway at that particular intersection is 35 miles per hour or less. The exact locations shall be as promulgated from time to time and at any time by the City Manager, who is hereby authorized to do so by the Common Council, as approved by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. All such locations shall be compiled, kept and updated in written form, and kept on file for public inspection at all times in the lobby of the Janesville Police Department, in the City Clerk-Treasurer’s Office and on the City's website. Such list of authorized locations is hereby adopted by reference and incorporated herein as if fully set forth verbatim. All additions and changes shall be updated on said list by the City Manager and/or his designees. 3. Subsections 1. and 2. are subject to the approval of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation as outline in Wisconsin Statute Section 349.26(3), as from time to time amended or renumbered. 10.71.030 OPERATION. A. The operation of a NEV LSV as permitted herein shall comply in all respects with Chapter 10 and other applicable provisions of the Code of General Ordinances of the City of Janesville, as applicable to the operation of motor vehicles. B. No person may operate a low-speed vehicle at a speed in excess of 25 miles per hour. 10.71.040 VIOLATION – PENALTY. A. Each violation of this chapter shall result in the issuance of a citation and the payment to the City of a forfeiture by the violator in an amount of not less than fifty dollars nor more than five hundred dollars together with applicable state penalty and other surcharges, and court costs. B. Each violation of a state or local traffic code not contained within this Chapter shall subject the operator of the NEV LSV to the citations and penalties set forth for such violations in the applicable state statutes and City ordinances. Such violations are cumulative to and not in lieu of those set forth for violations of this Chapter. ADOPTED: Motion by: Second by: APPROVED: Councilmember Aye Nay Pass Absent Brunner McDonald Eric J. Levitt, City Manager Perrotto Rashkin ATTEST: Steeber Truman Voskuil Jean Ann Wulf, City Clerk-Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____ _______ Assistant City Attorney Proposed by: Police Department Prepared by: Assistant City Attorney CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE MEMORANDUM March 15, 2011 TO: City Council FROM: Tim Wellnitz, Assistant City Attorney SUBJECT: Second reading, public hearing, and action on a proposed ordinance creating JGO Section 9.39.025 and amending JGO Section 9.39.030 prohibiting the Unlawful Use of Computerized Communication Systems in the City of Janesville. (File Ord. No. 2011-479) Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council adopt Proposed Ordinance 2011-479 creating JGO Section 9.39.025 and amending JGO Section 9.39.030 prohibiting the Unlawful Use of Computerized Communication Systems in the City of Janesville. Assistant City Manager’s Recommendation I concur with the recommendation of staff. Suggested Motion I move to adopt Proposed Ordinance No. 2011-479. Background Janesville Police Officer Jeffrey Justman brought to my attention the increase in calls for service that the Janesville Police Department has been receiving for threatening, abusive, and harassing conduct that has been occurring via the use of text messaging, electronic mail, and other computerized communication systems. Janesville ordinances currently prohibit various types of conduct that harasses, threatens, or intends to inflict injury on another via the unlawful use of a telephone in J.G.O. 9.39.020. This proposed ordinance would update Janesville ordinances to prohibit similar conduct that occurs via the use of text messaging, electronic mail, and other computerized communication systems. The proposed ordinance is similar to the prohibition for unlawful use of computerized communication systems in the Wisconsin Statutes in Wis. Stat. § 947.0125. Analysis Proposed Ordinance No. 2011-479 updates Janesville ordinances so as to keep up with the change in technology to prohibit various types of conduct that harasses, threatens, or intends to inflict injury on another via the use of computerized communication systems. cc: Eric Levitt, City Manager Jacob J. Winzenz, Assistant City Manager/Director of Administrative Services 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2011 - 479 An ordinance creating JGO Section 9.39.025 and amending JGO Section 9.39.030 prohibiting the Unlawful Use of Computerized Communication Systems in the City of Janesville with penalties as set forth in amended JGO 9.39.030. THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JANESVILLE DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 9.39.025 of the Code of General Ordinances of the City of Janesville is hereby created to read as follows: 9.39.025 Unlawful use of computerized communication systems . A. “Message” is defined in this section as any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data or intelligence of any nature, or any transfer of a computer program as defined in Section 943.70(1)(c) of the Wisconsin Statutes as from time to time amended or renumbered. B. No person shall do any of the following: 1. With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse, annoy, offend, or harass another person, send a message to the person or with a reasonable expectation that the person will receive the message on an electronic mail or other computerized communication system and in that message threaten to inflict injury or physical harm to any person or the property of any person. 2. With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse, annoy, offend, or harass another person, send a message on an electronic mail or other computerized communication system to the person or with a reasonable expectation that the person will receive the message and in that message use any obscene, lewd or profane language, or suggest any lewd or lascivious act. 3. With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse, annoy, offend, or harass another person, send a message to the person or with the reasonable expectation that the person will receive the message on an electronic mail or other computerized communication system while intentionally preventing or attempt to prevent the disclosure of his or her own identity. 4. With intent solely to harass or annoy another person, send repeated messages to the person or with the reasonable expectation that the person will receive the messages on an electronic mail or other computerized communication system. 5. With intent to harass or annoy another person, send a message to the person or with the reasonable expectation that the person will receive the message on an electronic mail or other computerized communication system while intentionally preventing or attempting to prevent the disclosure of his or her identity. 6. Knowingly permit or direct another person to send a message prohibited by this section from any computer terminal or other device that is used to send messages on an electronic mail or other computerized communication system and that is under his or her control. SECTION II. Section 9.39.030 of the Code of General Ordinances of the City of Janesville is hereby amended to read as follows: 9.39.030 Violation--Penalty . The penalty for violating Section 9.39.010 or Section 9.39.020 any provision set forth in this chapter shall be a forfeiture to the city of not less than fifty dollars nor more than five hundred dollars together with the costs of prosecution, or in default of payment of such forfeiture and costs, imprisonment in the county jail for not less than five nor more than sixty days. ADOPTED: Motion by: Second by: APPROVED: Councilmember Aye Nay Pass Absent Brunner McDonald Eric J. Levitt, City Manager Perrotto Rashkin ATTEST: Steeber Truman Jean Ann Wulf, City Clerk-Treasurer Voskuil APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________ Assistant City Attorney Proposed by: Police Department Prepared by: Police Department & Assistant City Attorney LEISURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM MEMO TO: City Council MEMO FROM: Shelley Slapak, Acting Recreation Director SUBJECT: Action on a Request to Waive the Special Event Fee for the Janesville Farmers Market DATE: March 22, 2011 ______________________________________________________________________ Summary Janesville Farmers Market, Inc. has submitted a Special Event Application to conduct the 2011 Farmers Market in downtown Janesville. The Market is scheduled to operate annually from Mother’s Day weekend (May 7) through the last Saturday in October (October 29) utilizing the 100 and 200 blocks of North Main Street. The Board of Directors has again requested that the City of Janesville waive the event fee for 2011. The Board is also requesting that the City waive the $832 equipment fee for 2011. It is the Board’s belief that the event fee ($550) and the equipment rental fee of ($832) would be cost prohibitive in operating the market now or any time in the near future. The Farmers Market Board may be purchasing equipment on their own and in turn would not need to rent our equipment (barricades and trash receptacles). Recommendation The Janesville Farmers Market, Inc. does not meet Council Policy #87 for special event permit fee exemption. Assistant City Manager Recommendation The City Council recently approved changes to Council Policy #87 which establishes criteria for waiving special event fees. The waiver request from the Farmer’s Market does not meet the criteria contained in that policy, however, in that policy the City Council reserves the authority to waive any portion of any Special Event Permit Fee. This is appropriately a policy question for the City Council. Suggested Motion Move to either approve or deny the request from Janesville Farmer’s Market, Inc. to waive the 2011 special event and equipment rental fees. Background & Analysis In 2005, the City executed an agreement with the Farmer’s Market Steering Committee to co-sponsor the Janesville Farmer’s Market. The program was jointly conducted by the two entities with a successful season ensuing. The intent of the City’s initial involvement was to provide expertise and financial support until the Farmer’s Market could become a viable entity and assume increased responsibility for operating and financially supporting the activity. In 2006, the Janesville Farmer’s Market Inc., made the decision to assume a more significant role in planning and operating the Farmer’s Market. The Farmer’s Market Steering Committee reorganized into Janesville Farmer’s Market, Inc. and hired a Marketing Director who was responsible for day to day operations. The Department of Leisure Services continued their support of the Market by hosting special events, assisting with advertisement, and logistical/financial support in terms of set up, barricade and trash barrel usage. In addition, the City Council waived the 2006 Special Event Fee. The 2006 season was again successful and experienced continued growth. In both the 2007 and 2008 seasons, the Market continued to be successful, providing the majority of its own advertising and hosting all of the special events that were held there. The City again assisted with barricade and trash barrel usage, as well as trash pickup. The City Council again waived the special event fee of $525 and the equipment rental fee in support of the Market. In 2009, the Farmers Market board requested a fee waiver again. The council voted and approved the waiver unanimously. In 2010, the Janesville Farmers Market Inc. Board of Directors requested to the City Council a fee waiver for 2010 and beyond. At that time, City Council approved the waiver of the 2010 special event fee of $530 and associated equipment charges totaling $832, but asked the Farmers Market Board to return in 2011 if requesting a fee waiver again. The Leisure Services Department is now in receipt of the 2011 Special Event Application and a letter from Bryan Meyers, Chairman of the Janesville Farmer’s Market, Inc. Board of Directors, requesting the City waive the special event fee of $550 and rental of equipment fee of $832 (see attached letter). The Market provides their own liability insurance (see attached). Leisure Services is also in receipt of their recycling plan (see attached). This matter is being brought before the City Council because Janesville Farmers Market, Inc. does not meet Council Policy #87 for special event permit fee exemption. cc: Eric Levitt, City Manager Jay Winzenz, Director of Admin. Services John Olson, Deputy Chief of Police 2 HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION MEMORANDUM March 28, 20111 TO: City Council FROM: Leslie A. Bentz, Benefits & Risk Manager SUBJECT: Supplemental Life Insurance Executive Summary As part of 2011-2012 contract negotiations with the Firefighters Local Number 580 Bargaining Unit, the City agreed to offer a supplemental life insurance program to employees at their expense through payroll deduction. Department Recommendation This employee-paid benefit was mutually agreed upon during contract negotiations with the Fire union. This contract was signed on February 16, 2011. Therefore, I move the adoption of Council File Resolution No. 2011-781 authorizing the City of Janesville's joining and eligible personnel's participation in the WRS ETF supplemental group life insurance program, effective forthwith, solely at the employees' expense. Assistant City Manager’s Recommendation This was agreed to as part of the most recent contract negotiations and there will be no City expense in offering this employee option. I concur with the department recommendation. Suggested Motion Move to adopt File Resolution 2011-781 Background The Fire Union was interested in an employee-paid mechanism that would fund health plan coverage for spouses of retirees or current employees who pass away. Currently, the health plan provides coverage for the surviving spouse of an active or retired firefighter until the retiree or employee would have turned age 65, at the cost of the spouse. The City proposed an employee-paid life insurance option as an economical means to address the Union’s concern. The City does provide Basic Life Insurance to all current full time and part time employees, which equals the employee’s earnings reported to the Wisconsin Retirement System for the previous year, rounded up to the next thousand. 1 Discussion The Wisconsin Department of Employee Trust Funds (ETF) offers a Supplemental Life Insurance Program, which is an additional 100 percent of employee’s previous year's earnings rounded up to the next thousand. The bargaining unit agreed this was an acceptable compromise and would provide the needed funds for a surviving spouse to continue to pay the full premium amount for continued health coverage. In providing this benefit, ETF requires that employers offer this benefit to all eligible employees, and not to just a certain group of employees. Therefore, to provide this benefit, the City must offer it to all eligible employees. Each eligible employee may decide if (s)he would like to participate in the benefit. Eligible employees are defined as all active employees who currently have Basic Life Insurance. Process Upon the City Council’s adoption of this resolution, ETF will send enrollment forms out to all eligible employees. The schedule is somewhat dependent on their timing, but it is anticipated that we can begin deductions and have the insurance effective in June 2011. cc: Susan A. Musick, Human Resources Director Eric J. Levitt, City Manager Jacob J. Winzenz, Director of Admin. Services/Assistant City Manager 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2011-781 A resolution authorizing the City of Janesville to join and allow eligible employees to participate in the ETF WRS supplemental life insurance program at the employee’s expense. Whereas the Janesville Common Council, pursuant to the applicable provisions of Chapter 40 of the Wisconsin Statutes now in effect and from time to time amended or renumbered, hereby determine, authorize, and find it appropriate that the City of Janesville join and participate in, and that its eligible personnel be included under, the following Group Life Insurance program(s) provided by ETF WRS, pursuant to Chapter 40 of the Wisconsin Statutes: [X] Supplemental Group Life Insurance Whereas the proper officers and/or officials of the City of Janesville are herewith authorized and directed to take all actions, make such deductions, and submit such eligible and participating City personnel payments as are required, from time to time and at any time, by the Group Insurance Board of the State of Wisconsin to provide such supplemental and/or other group life insurance, based upon the number of eligible employees enrolling in this benefit; and Whereas the City of Janesville WRS Agent will submit a certified copy of this adopted Resolution to the State of Wisconsin Department of Employee Trust Funds (ETF WRS). NOW, THEREFORE , the Common Council of the City of Janesville hereby authorize the City of Janesville and the City’s eligible personnel to join and participate in the WRS ETF supplemental Group Life Insurance program. Further, each of the above recitals is reiterated and included herein by reference as if fully set forth verbatim. Be It Further Resolved that the City Manager, City Clerk-Treasurer, and/or other City Manager designee(s), on behalf of the Common Council and the City of Janesville, may take any and all actions, enter into such additional agreement(s), and amend such actions and agreement(s) from time to time and at any time as may be deemed necessary and/or desirable by the City Manager for the City of Janesville to join and provide this benefit to the City’s eligible employees at their expense and/or so as to effectuate the intent and purpose of this Resolution; and that the City Clerk-Treasurer position, and its incumbent and acting Janesville City Clerk- Treasurer Jean Ann Wulf and her successors and her/their designee(s), be the City of Janesville WRS Agent for purposes of this supplemental life insurance program and benefit. CERTIFICATION [Required by ETF WRS] I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true, correct, and complete copy of the original Resolution th duly and regularly passed by the Common Council of the City of Janesville, Wisconsin, on the 28 day of March 2011; and that said Resolution has not been repealed or amended, and is now in full force and effect. I understand that Wis. Stat. Sec. 943.395 provides criminal penalties for knowingly making false and fraudulent statements on this form and hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information is true and correct. Employer Identification Number (EIN) 69-036-0985 ________________________________ Dated this 28th day of March 2011. Jean Ann Wulf, Clerk-Treasurer, WRS Agent 18 N. Jackson St. Number of WRS Eligible Employees: 444 Janesville, WI 53545 608-755-3000 wulfj@ci.janesville.wi.us 1 Motion by: ADOPTED: Second by: APPROVED: Councilmember Aye Nay Pass Absent Brunner McDonald Eric J. Levitt, City Manager Perrotto ATTEST: Rashkin Steeber Jean Ann Wulf, City Clerk-Treasurer Truman Voskuil APPROVED AS TO FORM: Wald Klimczyk, City Attorney Proposed by: Human Resources Prepared by: Human Resources & City Attorney 2 DUM ACCOUNTING DIVISION MEMORAN March 18, 2011 TO: City Council FROM: Patty Lynch, Comptroller SUBJECT: Authorization for the City Manager to File a Simplified Water Rate Increase with the Public Service Commission Executive Summary The proposed 2011 Water Utility budget included a recommendation to adjust rates using the Simplified Rate Case Application and Procedure. On March 1, the PSC announced that the 2011 rate increase factor was 3.0%, which matches the approved 2011 operating budget. A utility’s earnings are generally measured by a rate of return on the net utility plant. The resulting customer rates are designed to recover operation and maintenance expense, depreciation expense, taxes, and the rate of return. The rate of return is used for payment of debt principal and interest payments and to fund pay-as-you go equipment replacements and capital improvements In order to maintain the financial integrity of the Water Utility, we have determined that it is necessary to adjust our rate structure by increasing rates 3.0% effective during the second quarter of 2011 (upon issuance of the PSC rate order). These actions will permit the Utility to generate a return of 3.4% on its net investment in plant and infrastructure assets and will generate an additional $202,000 of annual revenue. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends filing the Simplified Rate Increase. Assistant City Manager Recommendation I concur with the staff recommendation Suggested Motion Move to authorize the City Manager to file a Simplified Rate Case Application with the Public Service Commission increasing water rates 3.0%. Background In 2009, the Water Utility was granted a rate increase, which was intended to permit the Utility to earn a 5.35% rate of return on its net plant investment. Although 5.35% was authorized, the Water Utility’s actual rate of return was 2.16% in 2010 (unaudited). The rate of return is lower than anticipated because 1 the water sales were 13.7% below projections. This revenue shortfall restricts the Utility’s ability to meet our current debt service requirements. The City of Janesville is eligible for a Simplified Rate Increase which would allow the City to implement a portion of the required rate increase more quickly. The City would be eligible for a 3.0% increase effective 45 days after the application was filed with the PSC. This would increase the average residential bill by $1.23 per quarter. Analysis Currently, the average residential customer’s quarterly utility bill is $120.40, which consists of a $35.85 charge for water, $4.90 for public fire protection and $79.65 for wastewater. The following table compares our current average utility bill to that of our peer cities. WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE COMPARISON PEER CITY COMPARISON - 10/15/2010 TOTAL PUBLIC FIRE TOTAL GRAND CITY WATER/QTR PROTECTION/QTR WASTEWATER/QTR TOTAL Fond du Lac $152.75 $18.00 $135.25 $306.00 Appleton $121.10 $14.58 $61.35 $197.03 Oshkosh $100.25 $5.50 $84.00 $189.75 Beloit $50.90 $11.94 $92.65 $155.49 Waukesha $66.16 $12.45 $76.40 $155.01 Green Bay $62.00 $7.20 $68.15 $137.35 Racine $62.75 NC $71.00 $133.75 Wausau $56.00 $8.70 $65.76 $130.46 Eau Claire $54.35 $9.60 $64.84 $128.79 Manitowoc $43.70 $8.40 $72.67 $124.77 Janesville - Current $35.85 $4.90 $79.65 $120.40 Kenosha $54.21 $7.86 $55.48 $117.55 Sheboygan $39.25 $7.65 $59.42 $106.32 La Crosse $35.25 NC $39.85 $75.10 AVERAGE PEER CITY $69.13 $10.17 $72.83 $150.57 Janesville - Proposed $36.93 $5.05 $79.65 $121.63 (Based on average residential quarterly consumption of 2,500 cubic feet and a 5/8 inch meter) When compared to our peer cities, our current rates are very reasonable. The proposed water rate increase equates to a 1% increase on the average Water and Wastewater Utility bill. Cc: Eric J. Levitt, City Manager Jacob J. Winzenz, Director of Administrative Services 2