Loading...
#2 Award of performance contract for Municipal Building PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM December 27, 2010 TO: City Council FROM: Carl J. Weber P.E., Director of Public Works SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE ENERGY SAVINGS PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT FOR THE CITY OF JANESVILLE MUNICIPAL BUILDING Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council award a performance contract to Johnson Controls, Inc. for energy conservation and facility improvement measures for the City of Janesville Municipal Building, to authorize the City Manager to negotiate the final terms and measures to be included in the contract and to authorize the direct purchase of a chiller for the Municipal Building. City Manager’s Recommendation The City Manager supports the Public Works department recommendation. Suggested Motion I move to award a performance contract to Johnson Controls, Inc. in accordance with their Proposal and Qualifications for a Comprehensive Energy Savings Performance Agreement for the City of Janesville Municipal Building dated 12/10/2010 and that the City Manager be authorized to negotiate the final terms and measures to be included in the contract. Further to authorize staff to direct purchase the replacement chiller identified in the proposal. Request The City Council has previously allocated funding for City building maintenance and directed staff to prepare a comprehensive building maintenance plan. Staff had previously reported that the HVAC equipment in the City Municipal Building needed to be evaluated and repaired or replaced. A performance contract is a process authorized by the State of Wisconsin Statute 66.0133 which accomplishes both evaluation and implementation of energy conservation and facility improvement measures. This proposal has been planned to allow for addressing the Municipal Building HVAC issues prior to the 2011 summer cooling season. Background  Solicitation of proposals: Staff, thru direct solicitation of known energy savings performance contractors and thru public notice, sought statements of qualification and proposals for a performance contract for the Municipal Building. Five firms toured the building and two submitted proposals: Honeywell International Inc. - Oak Creek, WI Johnson Controls – Madison, WI 1  Ranking Staff reviewed the proposals evaluating each of the firm’s qualifications, experience on similar projects, technical quality and range of services, ability to implement the proposals and financial considerations. Both firms are well qualified and have significant experience on similar projects for several public institutions in Wisconsin. To compare the cost and energy savings potential of the two proposals, staff compared a number of energy conservation measures side by side. Based on this comparison, staff finds and recommends that the proposal of Johnson Controls, Inc. is in the best interest of the City of Janesville.  Proposed Improvements The proposed improvements include: Chiller Replacement o Lighting Upgrades o HVAC Control System Upgrade o Installation of Variable Frequency Drives on water pumps and exhaust o fans Retuning of existing thermostat controls o Replacement of Coils in Air Handler Unit 1 o The proposal cost submitted by the two firms for the above improvements, including a contingency amount, is: Johnson Controls $350,048 o Honeywell $379,748 o  Local Contractor Opportunities The selected performance contractor will need the assistance of subcontractors for the installation of the recommended improvements. The Request for Proposals required that such assistance be openly bid to allow for competition. The RFP stated that utilization of local trades and labor would be given consideration in the selection process. Both firms have made efforts to contact local firms and are confident that local contractors will be available for completion of electrical, demolition, hoisting and other related trade work.  Funding Funding for this project is available from the following resources: 1. EECBG grant - $90,000 designated for lighting improvements 2. 2008-09 CIP - $100,000 designated for energy audits 3. 2008-09 CIP - $145,000 designated for Municipal Building HVAC improvements 4. Focus on Energy Grants - $15,000 or more as stated in the proposal Total $350,000  Costs The costs for the recommend improvements as indicated in the recommended proposal total about $350,000. This cost may be reduced by bidding of subcontracts. Other energy conservation and/or facility improvement measures 2 may be identified through more thorough investigation during final contract negotiation or project implementation. In no event shall costs exceed the available funds identified above.  Energy Savings Energy savings, as identified in the proposal, are guaranteed by the performance contractor. After a full year of implementation of the repairs, replacements and improvements an energy use audit will be completed. The audit will compare actual energy costs pre and post implementation (adjusted for variances in weather). Should the guaranteed energy cost savings not be realized, the performance contractor will refund the difference to the City.  Purchase of Chiller Because of the long lead time required for delivery of a chiller, it is recommended that staff be authorized to directly order and purchase a chiller prior to the execution of the performance contract. This will allow for timely installation of the unit and eliminate the sales tax cost to the City. cc: Eric Levitt, City Manager Jacob J. Winzenz, Assistant City Manager/Dir. of Administrative Services 3