Loading...
#2 Janesville Ice Rink Report CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM July 12, 2010 Updated August 16, 2010 TO: City Council FROM: Eric J. Levitt, City Manager SUBJECT: Discussion/possible action on report from Rink Management Services Corporation on the ice rink evaluation. Summary / Background In 2008, the City performed some preliminary evaluations of issues and possible deficiencies at the ice rink. During the spring of 2009, the City experienced several small failures and one large failure of the ice cooling system. In addition, there have been some continual structural concerns with the facility including the roof. Temporary repairs have been completed over the last year while a review of the current ice rink status has been on-going. A group of Janesville residents, now affiliated with the Janesville Youth Hockey Association, began developing a proposal to form a partnership with the City of Janesville to build a new rink rather than renovate the current rink. The proposed rink is located adjacent to the Youth Sports Complex and built on 11 acres of City owned land. The proposed partnership evolved over the summer into the th attached proposal. The proposal on October 26 had the following elements: ? The building and one sheet of ice would cost approximately $4 million (not including land). ? The expansion to a second sheet of ice would cost approximately an additional $1 million. ? The City is requested to commit an initial $2 million and an additional $500,000 when funds are raised for a second sheet of ice. ? The proposal projected the City to close its current $85,000 actual subsidy to a $0 operational subsidy when 2 sheets of ice are operational. ? The proposal discusses the expansion of users at the current rink over the last year ? The City Manager indicated to the group that due to concerns with competitive bidding, it would be his recommendation that if the City had ownership and responsibility for the operations of the facility that he believes that it would be best to competitively bid the project management and construction. The City Council in October approved $2 million in public funds for a one-sheet ice rink and up to $2.5 million in public funds for a two-sheet ice rink if private funds were raised to complete the facility. It was also approved to place the rink on the South side after discussion on location. The City currently has $2 million available for the rehabilitation of the current rink, the construction of a new rink or other eligible uses. The City contracted with an outside firm, Rink Management Services Corporation, this Spring for approximately $10,000 to do an overview evaluation of the current rink and the plans to construct a new rink. Typically to perform an intensive study of the current rink and evaluate the feasibility of a new facility would cost between $30,000 and $60,000. However, the City Manager believed that an abbreviated study for under $10,000 would provide enough valid information to provide an informed decision. Possible Motion I move to approve moving forward with contributing up to $2 million for a one-sheet rink that is expandable to two-sheets in the future if sufficient funds are raised by the private group by ________________. City Manager Recommendation As the City Council is aware this project has been an evolving concept or project since the Spring of 2009. Due to that there have been a variety of issues that have arisen during this dialogue. Issues of focus included: ? Location of a new rink (currently the Council has designated a south side site as the preferred site.) ? Whether to renovate the current rink or build a new facility. ? Whether to financially support constructing one sheet or two sheets. Rink Management Services Corporation prepared a report that provided an overview of the following issues: 1. An overview of the current rink and the ability for it to continue to operate. 2. Evaluation of the current design of the proposed rink from an operational standpoint and capital. 3. An overview of a Revenue/Expenditure evaluation for both current rink and a 2 sheet ice rink. After reviewing the attached report and having discussions with the firm, the City Manager has the following recommendations. 2 ? It appears that the current expenses would be close to $1 million for the basic renovation of the rink. This does not include any major enhancements. ? If the City could limit its contribution to $2 million and the contribution of City owned land for a new rink, I believe that would be the best course of action if it also meant that the new Central Fire Station would be included at the current rink location. ? If land needed to be purchased for the Central Fire Station, I recommend that renovation of the current rink be evaluated as the best option. ? I believe based on the report that the City should limit the contribution to a single sheet rink at this time with expansion capability. If other parties prefer a two sheet rink, the additional costs should be paid for from non- city funds. The reason for this recommendation is that I am not convinced that the property tax subsidy will be eliminated and am concerned that two-sheets may even place more burden on the subsidy if certain assumptions don’t play out. ? If the private group wants the City to revisit the site location of the south side, I would recommend that this occur at a future meeting. ? The City should maintain ownership of the current or a new rink in the near term. Update to Recommendation as of August 16th th The Ice Rink Advisory Committee met on August 11 to discuss the report from outside consultant. The Advisory Committee is looking to evaluate the amount of ice time purchased currently and the capacity in some of the user groups to increase their use to determine whether there is capacity to build two-sheets. As the City Manager has continued to evaluate the issue, I maintain my recommendation to construct a one-sheet ice rink that is expandable. I believe that a two-sheet ice rink should not be constructed until the City would be able to project an operating budget that would not have a subsidy. In evaluating the report, I believe that the expenditures would increase and that revenues could not increase to the level that would create a break-even budget. In evaluating past operations I have found that while the City’s expenses have increased 230,000 in 2002 to $275,000 in 2008; revenues decreased from $237,000 to $188,000 despite a doubling of open skate revenues. In 2009 we are able to increase revenues to approximately $220,000 and shrink the subsidy. But these overall trends concern me when evaluating a two-sheet rink option. Based on current expenditure levels, I would anticipate expenses climbing to at least $325,000 depending on how the second sheet was operated which would minimum of $105,000 require revenue to increase a to break even in operating expenses. Finally, I recommend that a financial commitment needs to occur from the private group by the end of this year, in order to move forward with renovating the 3 current rink if we do not construct a new rink. If we went forward with renovating the rink, I am estimating approximately $1.2 million in costs for basic design and improvements. 4