Loading...
#2 Action to file water rate increase DUM ACCOUNTING DIVISION MEMORAN April 17, 2009 TO: City Council FROM: Patty Lynch, Comptroller SUBJECT: Action to Authorize the City Manager to File a Water Rate Increase with the Public Service Commission Executive Summary The proposed 2009 Water Utility budget included a recommendation to adjust rates. This increase is necessary because of the decrease in water sales, and increase in operating expenses and capital improvements. A utility’s earnings are generally measured by a rate of return on the net utility plant. The resulting customer rates are designed to recover operation and maintenance expense, depreciation expense, taxes, and the rate of return. The rate of return is used for payment of debt principal and interest payments and to fund pay-as-you go equipment replacements and capital improvements In order to maintain the financial integrity of the Water Utility, we have determined that it is necessary to adjust our rate structure by increasing rates 14.75% effective during the third quarter of 2009 (upon issuance of the PSC rate order). These actions will permit the Utility to generate a return of 5.4% on its net investment in plant and infrastructure assets and will generate an additional $881,361 of annual revenue. Recommendation Staff recommends that council authorize the City Manager to file a 14.75% rate increase with the PSC. Suggested Motion Move to authorize the City Manager to file a water rate increase with the Public Service Commission (PSC). City Manager Recommendation After reviewing the background information, I recommend that the City Council proceed with authorizing staff to file the rate increase. The City would remain the third lowest rate out of our peer cities with the increase. Background In 2007, the Water Utility was granted a rate increase, which was intended to permit the Utility to earn a 6.0% rate of return on its net plant investment. 1 Although 6.0% was authorized, the Water Utility’s actual rate of return was 4.28% in 2008. Furthermore, without a rate adjustment, a 2.3% rate of return is projected for 2009. This situation would restrict the Utility’s ability to finance future capital improvements and meet our current debt service requirements. Since the 2007 rate case was prepared, operating expenses have increased 9.5%, primarily due to increases in economic adjustments ($276,645), cost of chemicals ($39,500), and depreciation ($90,612). During this same period, sales of water have decreased by 12.6%. The loss of water sales is due primarily to the shut down of the General Motors plant. General Motors constituted about 9% of the annual water sales or 6% of the total water revenues (in 2008 this amounted to 343 million gallons and $362,192). The table below shows the Utility’s rate of return, water sales, and operating income for 2007 rate study through 2009. The data reported for 2009 does not reflect the proposed rate increase. Staff will request that the rate of return authorized by the PSC drop from 6.0% to 5.4%. This rate of return will minimize the impact of the rate increase to the customer, while still provide adequate revenue for debt service and capital improvements. JANESVILLE WATER UTILITY RATE INDICATORS 2007 2007 2008 2009 Rate Study Actual Actual Projected Authorized Rate of Return 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 5.40% Incurred Rate of Return 4.68% 4.28% 2.30% Water Sales (Million CCF) 5.03 4.73 4.39 4.40 Operating Revenue $6,556,910 $5,915,168 $6,048,253 $6,090,625 Operating Expenses $4,965,051 $4,800,678 $4,940,239 $5,434,385 Operating Income $1,591,859 $1,114,490 $1,108,018 $ 656,240 The City of Janesville is also eligible for a Simplified Rate Increase which would allow the City to implement a portion of the required rate increase more quickly. The City would be eligible for a 3.8% increase effective 45 days after the application was filed with the PSC. This would increase the average residential bill by $1.52 per quarter. Staff recommends against filing the Simplified Rate Increase because it doesn’t generate sufficient revenue to meet the Utility’s financial requirements and would need to be followed shortly by another rate increase of about 11%. 2 Analysis Currently, the average residential customer’s quarterly water bill is $40.00, which consists of a $35.10 charge for water and $4.90 for public fire protection. The following table compares our current average water bill to that of our peer cities. WATER RATE 2008 PEER CITY COMPARISON TOTAL PUBLIC FIRE GRAND CITY WATER/QTR PROTECTION/QTR TOTAL Fond du Lac $125.00 $14.10 $139.10 Appleton $114.75 $14.31 $129.06 Oshkosh $100.25 $5.50 $105.75 Racine $52.00 $18.00 $70.00 Green Bay $62.00 $7.20 $69.20 Waukesha $55.97 $11.79 $67.76 Wausau $56.00 $8.70 $64.70 Beloit $50.90 $11.94 $62.84 Kenosha $50.75 $7.35 $58.10 Eau Claire $48.35 $9.46 $57.81 Manitowoc $43.70 $8.40 $52.10 Sheboygan $34.25 $6.30 $40.55 La Crosse $35.25 NC $35.25 Janesville (Current Rates) $35.10 $4.90 $40.00 AVERAGE PEER CITY $63.78 $11.19 $74.97 Janesville (Proposed Rates) $40.28 $5.62 $45.90 (Based on average residential quarterly consumption of 2,500 cubic feet and a 5/8 inch meter) When compared to our peer cities, our current rates are very reasonable. As a part of the rate review process, the Wisconsin Public Service Commission will prepare a cost of service study that determines the actual rate structure. The proposed rates listed in the table above assume the 14.75% increase will apply to the average residential customer, or $5.90 per quarter. City staff plans to request the PSC implement a water conservation rate structure which will help mitigate the rate increase impact to our low volume residential customers. Please find attached a comparison of our average residential quarterly bill, including both the water and wastewater charges, to that of our peer cities (Attachment I). Cc: Eric J. Levitt, City Manager Jacob J. Winzenz, Director of Administrative Services Daniel L. Lynch, Director of Utilities 3